Fortify Software Security Center vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Software Security Center and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Mahammad Azeem
Haider Jarral
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have.""You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.""This is a stable solution at the end of the day."

More Fortify Software Security Center Pros →

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator.""Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer.""CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function.""CyberFlood is flexible."

More Spirent CyberFlood Pros →

Cons
"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful.""We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved.""This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."

More Fortify Software Security Center Cons →

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes.""I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule.""CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better.""Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

More Spirent CyberFlood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
  • "The solution is priced fair."
  • More Fortify Software Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
  • More Spirent CyberFlood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
    Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
    Ranking
    Views
    392
    Comparisons
    321
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    247
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    615
    Comparisons
    391
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
    CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
    Learn More
    Overview
    Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

    Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

    Sample Customers
    Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
    Digicel
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify Software Security Center is ranked 27th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 3 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 26th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 4 reviews. Fortify Software Security Center is rated 7.4, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortify Software Security Center writes "A fair-priced solution that helps with application security testing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". Fortify Software Security Center is most compared with Fortify on Demand, Tricentis Tosca and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.