IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT vs Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT and Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Asset Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is a user-friendly solution that has a good user interface."

More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Pros →

"This product can be customized according to the needs of any company.""It is stable and scalable.""We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."

More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and technical support is not good enough."

More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Cons →

"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas.""The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated.""The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."

More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is an expensive solution."
  • More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "From my experience, Asset Manager is expensive."
  • More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is a user-friendly solution that has a good user interface.
    Top Answer:IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is an expensive solution. The solution's licensing cost depends on the number of nodes and servers. Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.
    Top Answer:The solution’s initial setup is complex and technical support is not good enough. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT should have a cloud-based version. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is expensive… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    17th
    out of 48 in IT Asset Management
    Views
    177
    Comparisons
    148
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    415
    Rating
    7.0
    Unranked
    In IT Asset Management
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Asset Management for IT
    Asset Manager, HPE Asset Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is designed to help track and manage your hardware and software IT assets, with particular emphasis on inventory, asset life-cycle management, and license management. Asset Management for IT includes inventory, asset tracking, asset reconciliation, financial management, contract management, procurement management, and, optionally, Service Level Agreement (SLA) management. This asset life-cycle functionality permits the tracking and management of IT assets through initial request, approval, procurement, contract, receipt, inventory, deployment, asset installs-moves-adds-changes (IMACs), and retirement.
    HPE Asset Manager automates best practices across the asset management lifecycle and integrates processes into IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) service support workflows including incident, problem, and change management to improve service quality and business outcomes.
    Sample Customers
    Migros Zurich, Tyr_ns AB, Port Otago Limited, BTC, Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., AIG, Swedish Match, DTE Energy
    Finansbank, MTS India, Sprint
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Asset Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is ranked 17th in IT Asset Management with 1 review while Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Asset Management. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is rated 7.0, while Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT writes "A user-friendly solution that has a good user interface, but its technical support is not good enough". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is most compared with BigFix, ServiceNow, Microsoft Configuration Manager and BMC Helix Discovery, whereas Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors and best License Management vendors.

    We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.