We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and vCenter Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."
"This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The stability and reliability are great."
"The product's initial setup process is very simple."
"The product's deployment phase was easy."
"vCenter Configuration Manager is a very good product, it works well."
"I appreciate it because it's very easy to set up and configure new disks and servers."
"The tool's scalability is good and easy, especially when compared to Microsoft Hyper-V."
"The most valuable features of vCenter Configuration Manager are highly mature technology."
"vCenter Configuration Manager is a mature solution with high quality."
"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas."
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated."
"The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."
"If the solution could manage on-premises and cloud resources with the help of one tool, it would be an extra agent."
"Some of the migrations are difficult to manage since the solution is not compatible with a few of the operating systems, which poses a challenge during the physical to virtual migration process."
"The reporting could be improved."
"The interface itself is not very user-friendly."
"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which could be cheaper."
"I would like there to be support for this solution in Iran."
"Not very user friendly, too many configurations."
"When vCenter is in a Microsoft environment, there is a lot of licensing involved, where we face some difficulties."
More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
More vCenter Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Asset Management while vCenter Configuration Manager is ranked 10th in Configuration Management with 50 reviews. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while vCenter Configuration Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Configuration Manager writes "A solution with a range of functionalities and several pricing plans that suit your needs". Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas vCenter Configuration Manager is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Satellite and BigFix.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.