We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and HPE Integrity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the stability."
"It is easy to scale if you have the licensing."
"The most valuable feature of the HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management and the robust design."
"The scalability has been good."
"We are very happy with flexible NIC configuration features which are possible if you combine the BladeServers with HPE flex switches in the enclosures."
"The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management. It is easy to communicate from the server to the storage."
"The solution uses a smaller space in our data centers. It uses less feeder and network cable, which reduces costs."
"The most valuable feature, of course, is its size as I can build a huge compute resource on it."
"What I like about HPE Integrity servers is how stable and easy to use they are."
"The benefit provided by the solution for my organization stems from the fact that it provides maximum reliability and availability to users."
"The product's most valuable features are troubleshooting and monitoring."
"It is very fast and easy to use."
"The tool provides good performance and productivity."
"We have what is called a chief data care center support. This is the highest level of support they have. We have been very happy with the support we have received."
"HPE Integrity is a reliable solution, but you'll need to refurbish the hardware because it's approaching the end of sale."
"HPE BladeSystem could improve the communication between the server and the storage."
"Really look at it closely, but really look at the Synergy product as well. That seems to me like that's the next evolution of the BladeSystem."
"HPE has a replacement system called Synergy, though it’s a more high-end system than the old C7000."
"We would like to see OneView software features as an additional feature."
"The support you get is dependant on the region. Some regions are better than others."
"I would like OneView to go over the current limit of 40 instances."
"They could include some embedded software for container technology."
"The response time in terms of getting technical support assistance could be improved."
"HPE Integrity has always been one step behind in areas like virtualization technologies, cloud enablement, the speed of backups, and replication."
"The monitoring is an area that needs some improvement."
"The virtualization of HPE Integrity could be simplified. We have discussed this issue with HPE and hopefully, they will have an update."
"The manageability must be improved."
"HPE Integrity is a pain. HPE hasn't put much work into developing the solution in the past few years because it will be discontinued soon."
"HPE Integrity needs improvement in terms of pricing for scalability."
"Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365."
HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 133 reviews while HPE Integrity is ranked 8th in Blade Servers with 19 reviews. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6, while HPE Integrity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Integrity writes "Highly stable, straightforward, and easy to use". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X, whereas HPE Integrity is most compared with Super Micro SuperBlade, HPE Superdome X and HPE Synergy. See our HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Integrity report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.