HPE BladeSystem vs NEC Sigmablade-H

HPE BladeSystem is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 65 reviews vs NEC Sigmablade-H which is ranked 19th in Blade Servers with 0 reviews. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Gives the administrator the ability to build a processing infrastructure remotely". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with Lenovo Blade Servers, Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Integrity. NEC Sigmablade-H is most compared with Lenovo Blade Servers, Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE BladeSystem.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Use NEC Sigmablade-H? Share your opinion.
Blade servers report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Lenovo and others in Blade Servers.
254,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing HPE BladeSystem vs NEC Sigmablade-H

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
​The price could be cheaper.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Blade servers report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Lenovo and others in Blade Servers.
254,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
16,799
Comparisons
3,019
Reviews
65
Followers
597
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
265
Comparisons
218
Reviews
0
Followers
309
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Pgzybd0n 400x400
Compared 9% of the time.
See more HPE BladeSystem competitors »
Pgzybd0n 400x400
Compared 6% of the time.
See more NEC Sigmablade-H competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsHP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystemSigmablade-H
Website/Video
Website/VideoHewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Vendor 7386 screenshot 1515864945
NEC
  • Vendor 7665 screenshot 1514058177
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewHP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

The NEC N8405-024F Blade Enclosure (SIGMABLADE-H) can integrate a maximum of 16 servers' functions into one blade enclosure by housing a maximum of 16 CPU blades and 8 pass-through cards or switch modules in a case of 10U (about 445mm). 

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersEMIS HealthMiyakonojo City Council
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
11%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
No Data Available
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
11%
Midsize Enterprise
17%
Large Enterprise
71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
19%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
43%
No Data Available
Blade servers report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Lenovo and others in Blade Servers.
Download now
254,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email