Anonymous UserExecutive Director at a financial services firm
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
"It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
"Its pricing was good. We selected this solution because it was within our budget. We paid just once when we bought it. We never bought any license."
Earn 20 points
The NEC N8405-024F Blade Enclosure (SIGMABLADE-H) can integrate a maximum of 16 servers' functions into one blade enclosure by housing a maximum of 16 CPU blades and 8 pass-through cards or switch modules in a case of 10U (about 445mm).
HPE BladeSystem is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 10 reviews while NEC Sigmablade-H is ranked 22nd in Blade Servers. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.4, while NEC Sigmablade-H is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Easy to set up and offers good scalability with a small footprint". On the other hand, HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Superdome X, Dell PowerEdge M and Lenovo Flex System, whereas NEC Sigmablade-H is most compared with .
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.