HPE BladeSystem vs NEC Sigmablade-M

HPE BladeSystem is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 65 reviews vs NEC Sigmablade-M which is ranked 21st in Blade Servers. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Gives the administrator the ability to build a processing infrastructure remotely". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with Cisco UCS B-Series, Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] and Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series. NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, HPE Superdome X and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL].

HPE BladeSystem

NEC Sigmablade-M

18051

HPE BladeSystem

Based on 65 reviews.

18365

NEC Sigmablade-M

Most Helpful Review

reviewer793950

Sr. Manager / Systems Specialist

Virtual Fabric and interconnects are easy to configure and maintain

* Ease of use * Reliable * Scalable * Simple This has drastically reduced our datacenter space, has good cooling and power consumption. Cabling... Read more »

Use NEC Sigmablade-M? Share your opinion.

Blade servers report from it central station 2018 05 19 thumbnail

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers.

Download now

270,047 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing HPE BladeSystem vs NEC Sigmablade-M

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000.The price could be cheaper.Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them.The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available.With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country.Their licensing program is pretty simple.

Information Not Available

Download Free Report Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Download now 270,047 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	1st out of 26 In Blade Servers Views 15,051 Comparisons 2,405 Reviews 65 Followers 605 Avg. Rating 8.5	21st out of 26 In Blade Servers Views 170 Comparisons 151 Reviews 0 Followers 303 Avg. Rating N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem Compared 29% of the time. Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] vs. HPE BladeSystem Compared 24% of the time. Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs. HPE BladeSystem Compared 9% of the time. See more HPE BladeSystem competitors »	Dell PowerEdge M vs. NEC Sigmablade-M Compared 17% of the time. HPE Superdome X vs. NEC Sigmablade-M Compared 12% of the time. Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] vs. NEC Sigmablade-M Compared 8% of the time. See more NEC Sigmablade-M competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As	HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem	Sigmablade-M
Website/Video
Website/Video	Hewlett Packard Enterprise	NEC
Overview
Overview	HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.	The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches.
OFFER
Learn more about HPE BladeSystem Learn More	Learn more about NEC Sigmablade-M Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	EMIS Health	Sysmex Shanghai
Top Industries
Top Industries	REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm 18% Energy/Utilities Company 8% Comms Service Provider 7% Government 7% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Energy/Utilities Company 12% Aerospace/Defense Firm 11% Government 9% Financial Services Firm 9%	No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size	REVIEWERS Small Business 11% Midsize Enterprise 17% Large Enterprise 71% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business 18% Midsize Enterprise 39% Large Enterprise 43%	No Data Available

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers.

Download now

270,047 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See also HPE BladeSystem Reviews, NEC Sigmablade-M Reviews, and our list of Best Blade Servers Companies.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.