Compare HPE BladeSystem vs. Oracle Netra Modular System

HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 14 reviews while Oracle Netra Modular System is ranked 22nd in Blade Servers. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.4, while Oracle Netra Modular System is rated 0. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Gives us good server density and a harmonized hardware solution". On the other hand, HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Superdome X, whereas Oracle Netra Modular System is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle Netra Modular System? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000.​The price could be cheaper.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
6,518
Comparisons
4,244
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
289
Avg. Rating
8.4
22nd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
66
Comparisons
30
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 82% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
Learn
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Oracle
Overview
HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Oracle’s Netra Modular System is a transformative platform for customers looking to build out their communications on-premises and cloud infrastructures. With extreme agility and scale in a platform that can be completely virtualized, customers benefit from accelerated development, rapid bring up, and low-cost maintenance. Netra Modular System takes today’s traditional bladed and rackmount architectures and merges them to create a new innovative best-of-breed next-generation platform. This integrated system is designed to handle compute, networking, and storage evolution without forklift upgrades. Netra Modular System provides the service and business agility required in today’s fast-paced market. 

Offer
Learn more about HPE BladeSystem
Learn more about Oracle Netra Modular System
Sample Customers
EMIS HealthOvum
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Government8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Manufacturing Company22%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government10%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email