Compare HPE BladeSystem vs. Oracle Netra Modular System

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle Netra Modular System? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."

More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
438,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
6,479
Comparisons
4,837
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
320
Avg. Rating
7.3
23rd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
42
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 81% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
Learn
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Oracle
Overview
HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Oracle’s Netra Modular System is a transformative platform for customers looking to build out their communications on-premises and cloud infrastructures. With extreme agility and scale in a platform that can be completely virtualized, customers benefit from accelerated development, rapid bring up, and low-cost maintenance. Netra Modular System takes today’s traditional bladed and rackmount architectures and merges them to create a new innovative best-of-breed next-generation platform. This integrated system is designed to handle compute, networking, and storage evolution without forklift upgrades. Netra Modular System provides the service and business agility required in today’s fast-paced market. 

Offer
Learn more about HPE BladeSystem
Learn more about Oracle Netra Modular System
Sample Customers
EMIS HealthOvum
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government8%
Comms Service Provider6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider23%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 4 reviews while Oracle Netra Modular System is ranked 23rd in Blade Servers. HPE BladeSystem is rated 7.2, while Oracle Netra Modular System is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Gives us good server density and a harmonized hardware solution". On the other hand, HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Superdome X, Super Micro SuperBlade and Lenovo Flex System, whereas Oracle Netra Modular System is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.