HPE BladeSystem vs SGI Rackable Systems

HPE BladeSystem is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 65 reviews vs SGI Rackable Systems which is ranked 16th in Blade Servers with 0 reviews. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Gives the administrator the ability to build a processing infrastructure remotely". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with Lenovo Blade Servers, Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Integrity. SGI Rackable Systems is most compared with Cisco UCS B-Series, Lenovo Blade Servers and HPE BladeSystem.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Use SGI Rackable Systems? Share your opinion.
Blade servers report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Lenovo and others in Blade Servers.
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing HPE BladeSystem vs SGI Rackable Systems

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
​The price could be cheaper.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Blade servers report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Lenovo and others in Blade Servers.
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
16,799
Comparisons
3,019
Reviews
65
Followers
597
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
377
Comparisons
292
Reviews
0
Followers
313
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Pgzybd0n 400x400
Compared 9% of the time.
See more HPE BladeSystem competitors »
See more SGI Rackable Systems competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsHP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystemRackable Systems
Website/Video
Website/VideoHewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Vendor 7386 screenshot 1515864945
SGI
  • Vendor 7975 screenshot 1514061096
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewHP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

SGI Rackable standard-depth, rackmount servers and clusters deliver top value and performance, based on the winning combination of the latest Intel processor architectures and SGI expertise in designing and delivering the most advanced performance computing systems available. Rackable servers support up to 1.5TB of memory per node in an ultra-dense architecture with up to 88 cores per 1U. Add to this support for FDR and EDR InfiniBand, 22-core processors and DDR4 memory, and you have some of the most powerful cluster solutions available.

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersEMIS HealthDownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG), Tagged
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
11%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
No Data Available
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
11%
Midsize Enterprise
17%
Large Enterprise
71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
19%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
43%
No Data Available
Blade servers report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Lenovo and others in Blade Servers.
Download now
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email