HPE Business Exchange Services vs OpenText Trading Grid comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Business Exchange Services and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use HPE Business Exchange Services?
VARUNKUMAR
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The solution is easy to implement.
Top Answer:The pricing is moderate. I'd rate the solution three out of five in terms of affordability.
Top Answer:If you are on Trading Grid and you're trying to fetch the data, for example, the IDoc from SAP or the transfer data, sometimes there are system glitches wherein you will not be able to download the… more »
Ranking
Views
81
Comparisons
62
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
608
Comparisons
427
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
783
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
HPE BES
Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid
Learn More
Overview

HPE Business Exchange Services provide global, scalable B2B integration brokerage solutions and services that enable clients to better communicate, connect, and exchange data with their trading partners. They improve business performance and accelerate growth through platform optimization, integration, process, and community management, and visibility service capabilities. We provide exceptional value through a total managed services solution, freeing up our client's financial and human capital for reinvestment and growth.

OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company16%
Manufacturing Company11%
Retailer10%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise62%
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HPE Business Exchange Services is ranked 20th in Business-to-Business Middleware while OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 8th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review. HPE Business Exchange Services is rated 0.0, while OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". HPE Business Exchange Services is most compared with , whereas OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SAP Cloud Platform.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.