OpenText Content Manager vs Sonian Archiving comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Content Manager and Sonian Archiving based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • "I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."
  • More OpenText Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs. You will have to pay more… more »
    Top Answer:OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    5th
    out of 23 in File Archiving
    Views
    201
    Comparisons
    91
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    8.3
    17th
    out of 23 in File Archiving
    Views
    45
    Comparisons
    20
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    View Archive securely preserves electronic communications, making them searchable and accessible in the cloud. With fast and accurate search, you find exactly what you need - whenever you need it.
    Sample Customers
    Missouri State Courts
    CWS Capital Partners LLC, Center for Applied Research, Georgia Institute of Technology
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise55%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    File Archiving
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Content Manager is ranked 5th in File Archiving with 21 reviews while Sonian Archiving is ranked 17th in File Archiving. OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6, while Sonian Archiving is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". On the other hand, OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Microsoft Purview Records Management, whereas Sonian Archiving is most compared with .

    See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

    We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.