We performed a comparison between HPE Enterprise Routers and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It is more durable than other products in the market."
"It makes it easy to update the network technology and manage multiple deals, all without needing technical knowledge."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"Extensive support for cellular range for Wi-Fi technologies"
"HPE routers are easier to manage than any other router I've used."
"It has good scalability."
"These routers help us to provide high availability to our clusters."
"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."
"It is very stable and scalable."
"Juniper's custom Trio chipset drives their MX routers, offering superior performance. Juniper's design separates the control plane and the forwarding plane, which is a key aspect of their architecture. This separation provides high throughput, maintaining line-rate performance across the MX platform."
"The solution is stable."
"It offers high protection and I like it."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers has a CLR and it's more reliable and faster than others."
"The most valuable features for us were related to our transition into MPLS technology, specifically for BPN and VPN services."
"The product is easy to use."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Better management tools are needed."
"The solution is expensive."
"Compatibility with other platforms could be improved."
"They should work on lowering their prices in Brazil to stay competitive with rivals and offer customers more affordable options."
"Technical support could be better."
"I'd like to see more security features, like support for different types of encryptions."
"Its customer service could be better for older equipment models."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"We'd like them to be capable of adding firewall options to the license."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"Automation can also be improved."
"Enhancing the capacity would be a welcome improvement."
"One thing that the product can do better is clustering. Rather than just having two of them, it would help if there was one cluster to extend to more notes in the cluster itself."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers could improve by adding a graphical user interface(GUI). They do not have one. Most of our team has to have a background or expertise in Juniper. When compared to other solutions, they have a GUI. It will be easier for new team members to get familiar with, configure, or set up the router. Additionally, adding some monitoring tools would help us."
"It is not scalable, unfortunately."
HPE Enterprise Routers is ranked 7th in Routers with 7 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. HPE Enterprise Routers is rated 8.2, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE Enterprise Routers writes "Has excellent scalability and is cost-effective compared to its competitors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". HPE Enterprise Routers is most compared with Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches and Cisco Cloud Services Router, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch and ExtremeRouting. See our HPE Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
