HPE EVA vs NetApp V-Series [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
383 views|317 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
NetApp Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE EVA and NetApp V-Series [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
383
Comparisons
317
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
EVA P6000 series, HP EVA
Learn More
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Video Not Available
NetApp
Video Not Available
Overview
Lean IT budgets require more efficient ways of managing data. Driving business growth and agility requires simple yet flexible storage that reduces costs while maintaining application availability. With an installed base of over 100,000, mid-sized organizations count on HP EVA Storage. This fifth-generation, virtualized storage array provides availability while increasing productivity and capacity utilization.
NetApp V-Series storage virtualization controllers provide leading data protection, data management, and storage efficiency for your existing EMC, HDS, HP, IBM, Fujitsu, and NetApp E-Series storage arrays. Reclaim 35% or more capacity and reduce what you must spend for new disk drives to handle data growth by using NetApp storage efficiency features such as deduplication, thin provisioning, and compression. Optimize your workload performance with our broad flash portfolio.
Sample Customers
Bank Simpanan Nasional, EDF, Saint Mary's University, Thomson Reuters
City of Houston, Health Choice Network, SVC Bank, Plex Systems, Larsen & Toubro, IWD, JCVI
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm13%
Computer Software Company11%
Manufacturing Company10%
University10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while NetApp V-Series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). HPE EVA is rated 8.6, while NetApp V-Series [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp V-Series [EOL] writes "Connects third-party storage to back end with all NetApp functionalities available". HPE EVA is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA, whereas NetApp V-Series [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.