HPE EVA vs Nexsan BEAST comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
383 views|317 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Nexsan Logo
176 views|138 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE EVA and Nexsan BEAST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
VladimirKaploun
Use Nexsan BEAST?
Ranking
Views
383
Comparisons
317
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
176
Comparisons
138
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
EVA P6000 series, HP EVA
BEAST, Nexsan SASBeast, SASBeast, Nexsan DATABeast, Nexsan SATABeast, Nexsan SATABeast Xi, SATABeast Xi
Learn More
Overview
Lean IT budgets require more efficient ways of managing data. Driving business growth and agility requires simple yet flexible storage that reduces costs while maintaining application availability. With an installed base of over 100,000, mid-sized organizations count on HP EVA Storage. This fifth-generation, virtualized storage array provides availability while increasing productivity and capacity utilization.

Nexsan SASBeast is a high-capacity, high-performance, enterprise-class storage array system ideal for transactional applications that demand high I/O per second. With its storage density of 25.2TB offered in a 4U configuration, SASBeast has the ability to scale to hundreds of terabytes of capacity in a single rack. With 42 high-speed SAS drives, it's optimized for customers whose infrastructures support Microsoft Exchange, Oracle, SQL and other databases, as well as those that involve large file servers, virtual server environments or large amounts of small files. Equally important, SASBeast includes FC and iSCSI connectivity and allows customers to combine SAS, SSD and SATA drives within the same system to address different application requirements.

Sample Customers
Bank Simpanan Nasional, EDF, Saint Mary's University, Thomson Reuters
Clark Enersen Partners
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm13%
Computer Software Company11%
Manufacturing Company10%
University10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Nexsan BEAST is ranked 12th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). HPE EVA is rated 8.6, while Nexsan BEAST is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". On the other hand, HPE EVA is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA, whereas Nexsan BEAST is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.