HPE EVA vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
383 views|317 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
626 views|475 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE EVA and Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
VladimirKaploun
RobertMakale
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years.""​It is very stable.""​HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement.​"

More HPE EVA Pros →

"I like its storage capacity, quick access to the data, speed, and overall storage management."

More Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Pros →

Cons
"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."

More HPE EVA Cons →

"The main thing Oracle can improve is the cost. It would be better if Oracle opened up the system to enable integration with other vendors. Whether it's the database, application server, or storage appliance, they should make it easy to integrate them. They need to open up more to ensure that it can work in any environment and IT ecosystem."

More Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price could be better. We have many competing products now like Huawei and Dell EMC, and these are slightly cheaper."
  • More Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    383
    Comparisons
    317
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    626
    Comparisons
    475
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    EVA P6000 series, HP EVA
    Sun ZFS Storage Appliance
    Learn More
    Overview
    Lean IT budgets require more efficient ways of managing data. Driving business growth and agility requires simple yet flexible storage that reduces costs while maintaining application availability. With an installed base of over 100,000, mid-sized organizations count on HP EVA Storage. This fifth-generation, virtualized storage array provides availability while increasing productivity and capacity utilization.

    Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance integrates the cloud into its core architecture, making cloud storage available to all users and access protocols while eliminating on-premises cloud access licensing charges and the need for external gateways. Built using a powerful SMP design, multi-threaded OS, massive DRAM caches, and all flash storage, Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance powers the most demanding applications, from fast query responses and, rapid transaction processing to virtualization and cloud workloads. With these performance levels, you can easily achieve 4:1 consolidation of your current NAS filers and gain a higher return on your storage investment.

    Sample Customers
    Bank Simpanan Nasional, EDF, Saint Mary's University, Thomson Reuters
    Translational Genomics Research Institute, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, CyberSolutions Inc., Y-Telecom, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Mutlinet Pakistan, TDC A/S, Digi-Key Corporation, Thurgau Cantonal Bank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    University10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Construction Company7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is ranked 8th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). HPE EVA is rated 8.6, while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance writes "A stable unified storage system that enables quick access to data". HPE EVA is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA, whereas Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is most compared with NetApp FAS Series, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), IBM FlashSystem, HPE 3PAR StoreServ and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform.

    See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

    We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.