We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"I like that it gives you all the flexibility, for example, auto-scaling. Everything is figured out exactly right. It manages all your workloads without much intervention. It can scale in, scale out, and with security. Everything looks pretty good compared to the old legacy way of working."
"The best thing about Kubernetes is that most of the containerized applications are centralized."
"The self-serving feature allows our developers to grab a container and complete testing."
"The performance is good."
"We find the smooth, instant fail-safes in this solution to be very useful, as this allows for easy revival of dying quads or failing applications."
"This solution provides a comprehensive way to scale up our ports and containers, without having to use multiple products."
"The auto-repair function in Kubernetes is perfect. When something breaks, the auto-repair function automatically repairs it. If you are running the content in Kubernetes, you have a good set up. You do not need to do anything for the management of this. So, the automation of Kubernetes is number one."
"The best thing about Kubernetes is orchestration. It is very good. We will not see much downtime unless there are some human errors. We do not see much downtime or issues with the container or automation."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"The plugins could be better. That is one pain point we had, and we had to get in with many other open standards, like Calico networking and more."
"Kubernetes can improve pod escalation."
"We would to have additional features related to security within the API, instead of needing to install add-ons."
"The price is something they need to improve."
"The solution lacks some flexibility."
"Some Kubernetes technical support would be helpful."
"The solution can be quite complex for many users."
"The Kubernetes dashboard can be improved. It is currently a mess. We were using Rancher earlier, and everyone was happy with the dashboard. Right now, we are using Kubernetes, and it's not working with Microsoft workstations. We still have problems with the dashboard. It's terrible."
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 16th in Container Management while Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 67 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while Kubernetes is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Docker and Rancher Labs, whereas Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Portainer.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.