We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"OpenShift is a user-friendly container platform with a solid GUI that helps you follow what is going on and gives you an overview of all your clusters. It's more user-friendly than the Kubernetes itself. The interface helps you learn the platform and provides access to some features or specific comments."
"The stack in the software supply chain is one of the main reasons that we use OpenShift. When I came to this company, we bought hardware from IBM named Bluemix, and they used ICP, which stands for IBM Cloud Private."
"The banking transactions, inquiries, and account opening have been the most valuable."
"It is very lightweight and can be deployed very fast, especially when it comes to containers."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"The software is user-friendly and straightforward to use, which is favorable to a developer."
"Red Hat's security throughout the stack and software supply chain is good. It is a lightweight operating system. You don't have to worry about the security patches on the system. You can update the entire environment with security patches, which is a nice feature."
"The platform is easy to scale as it supports Windows worker node."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"The setup process is not great."
"There should be a simplification of the overall cluster environment. It should require fewer resources. Just to run a simple Hello World app, it requires about seven servers, and that's just crazy. I understand that it is fully redundant, but it's prohibitively expensive to get something simple going."
"The support costs are too high."
"We've encountered challenges when transitioning applications between these environments."
"There is room for improvement with integration."
"OpenShift has certain restrictions in terms of managing the cluster when it's running on a public cloud. For example, identity and access management integration with the IM of AWS is quite difficult. It requires some open-source tools to integrate. This is one area where I always see room for improvement."
"The UI could be more user-friendly to drive tasks more effectively through the interface."
"We encounter difficulties while accessing the environment and managing the cluster. This particular area needs improvement."
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 16th in Container Management while OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 36 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with Kubernetes, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Docker and Rancher Labs, whereas OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service and Google Kubernetes Engine.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
