We performed a comparison between HPE OneView and Scout APM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."
"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."
"It gives us a view of all our servers, which we did not have before in real-time."
"We lose less time managing the machines."
"OneView provides a single console, which is manageable without physical access."
"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."
"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."
"We could literally swap out a piece of hardware, slide one back into the chassis, and immediately - about three reboots later - it was identical. We didn't have to worry about configuring it, we didn't have to spend any time getting anything into place. It came back and it healed the environment almost immediately."
"The product can scale."
"I saw, maybe three years ago or two years ago here, or in Barcelona, at the HPE Discover conference, a feature that you can update Clusterware with VMware. But the feature is still not live in production. Currently, you have to do all the firmware updates and then you have to do the VMware updates. So you have two reboots and it would be better if it was just one."
"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."
"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."
"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."
"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."
"Sometimes the interface can be a little confusing, sometimes the error messages can be very cryptic, as far as what's actually going on."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."
"I can't recall coming across any missing features."
HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews while Scout APM is ranked 29th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. HPE OneView is rated 8.0, while Scout APM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Scout APM writes "Great visibility and reliability with fair pricing". HPE OneView is most compared with Dell CloudIQ, Cisco Intersight, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and SolarWinds NPM, whereas Scout APM is most compared with Zabbix, Datadog, Prometheus, New Relic and Grafana.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.