We performed a comparison between HPE OneView and Tintri Global Center [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The solution's technical support was great...The initial setup of HPE OneView was easy."
"We get templates, so it's speed to delivery for us. It's a big difference with the template features."
"Profile templates: The ability to generate the profiles and lay them down so the servers are built consistently. I would say that's probably the biggest piece of it."
"It monitors all our servers, and if there is any problem it straight away sends us an alert. If It's a faulty component, we can see it from there. It sends an alert."
"Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."
"Deploys faster new virtual services."
"Just the ability to provision the servers with storage and network everything within one interface, not having to go into multiple interfaces to provision those pieces."
"Easy to see if all my servers are on correct firmware levels, with SPP packaging."
"The Tintri product line as a whole has freed up a lot of resources from constant administration of legacy enterprise storage."
"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."
"Specifically, it would be great if we had the ability to reapply the server profile faster."
"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."
"I saw, maybe three years ago or two years ago here, or in Barcelona, at the HPE Discover conference, a feature that you can update Clusterware with VMware. But the feature is still not live in production. Currently, you have to do all the firmware updates and then you have to do the VMware updates. So you have two reboots and it would be better if it was just one."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."
"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."
"The network configuration part of HPE OneView needs improvement. The solution has way too many features, and there's a need for proper configuration indicators to be put in place."
"A better Tintri would be a "cheaper" one to get things started again."
Earn 20 points
HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews while Tintri Global Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. HPE OneView is rated 8.0, while Tintri Global Center [EOL] is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri Global Center [EOL] writes "Provides VM protection with scheduled snapshots and replication". HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM and Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator, whereas Tintri Global Center [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
