Compare HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Lenovo Rack Servers

HPE ProLiant DL Servers is ranked 1st in Rack Servers with 3 reviews while Lenovo Rack Servers is ranked 3rd in Rack Servers with 2 reviews. HPE ProLiant DL Servers is rated 9.0, while Lenovo Rack Servers is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE ProLiant DL Servers writes "Lower failure rate and great stability but could use a better hard drive base". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Rack Servers writes "Cheap solution in comparison to other products on the market". HPE ProLiant DL Servers is most compared with Dell EMC PowerEdge Rack Servers, Lenovo Rack Servers and HPE Apollo, whereas Lenovo Rack Servers is most compared with HPE ProLiant DL Servers, Dell EMC PowerEdge Rack Servers and IBM Power Systems. See our HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Lenovo Rack Servers report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Lenovo Rack Servers and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
There is a lot of extra storage. I am only using half of what I need.

Read more »

It is a scalable product.Ensures high availability, better hardware management, and support for active features.

Read more »

Cons
If they could put a SAN storage or resend it in the same product, it would be very helpful and more powerful.

Read more »

It was complex to get this started because the Lenovo and VMware are not very compatible. We had to get some updates in order for it to be implemented.Throughout the use of the product, special needs will arise which may require a global need.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It is the cheapest solution we have seen on the market.As the costs got high, we had to use the virtualization feature to consolidate the server farm.​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 14 in Rack Servers
Views
20,331
Comparisons
16,140
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
547
Avg. Rating
9.0
3rd
out of 14 in Rack Servers
Views
6,786
Comparisons
5,464
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
232
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
HP ProLiant DL series, HP ProLiant DLIBM Rack Servers, ThinkSystem SR Series
Learn
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Lenovo
Overview
ProLiant Servers provide a complete infrastructure that support both your business objectives and your business growth.

From growing small businesses to enterprise workloads, Lenovo rack servers offer the unmatched value, flexibility and industry-leading efficiency to meet mission-critical demands with legendary quality and reliability.

Offer
Learn more about HPE ProLiant DL Servers
Learn more about Lenovo Rack Servers
Sample Customers
AmeriPride Services, iSource, Bolagsverket, BlueShore Financial, British Columbia Assessment Authority, National Stock Exchange, CardlyticsimmixGroup, Komsomolskaya Pravda, SRG Global, Seekr, Infiniti Red Bull Racing, jKool, Tennis Australia, VEKA, Netpoints, Gamma Powersports
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm13%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider17%
Retailer7%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company21%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company15%
Retailer9%
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Lenovo Rack Servers and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.