Compare HPE Serviceguard vs. Swarm64
Ranking  | |
Views 484 Comparisons 337 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 118 Comparisons 62 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 34% of the time.  Compared 33% of the time.  Compared 26% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Serviceguard, HP Serviceguard | |
Learn | |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise | Swarm64 Video Not Available |
Overview | |
| HPE Serviceguard is a high availability and disaster recovery clustering solution, that increases uptime for your critical applications by protecting from a multitude of infrastructure and application faults across physical or virtual environments over any distance. It reduces impact of unplanned downtime with no compromise on data integrity and performance. Furthermore, it helps achieve near zero planned downtime for maintenance. | Swarm64 seamlessly combines hard- and software into an engineered solution for greater business efficiency and performance. The S64DA is the out of the box solution to add analytical power to your relational databases. |
Offer | |
Learn more about HPE Serviceguard | Learn more about Swarm64 |
Sample Customers | |
| RI-Solution, FAW-Volkswagen, Pella, Octo Telematics, Kenya Ports Authority | Alliance Venture, Target Partners, Investinor |
HPE Serviceguard is ranked 4th in High Availability Clustering while Swarm64 is ranked 7th in High Availability Clustering. HPE Serviceguard is rated 0.0, while Swarm64 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, HPE Serviceguard is most compared with Windows Server Failover Clustering, Veritas InfoScale Availability, DRBD and IBM PowerHA System Mirror, whereas Swarm64 is most compared with .
See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.
We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.