Ranking | |
Views 294 Comparisons 232 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 183 Comparisons 134 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 56% of the time. ![]() Compared 26% of the time. ![]() Compared 18% of the time. | ![]() Compared 100% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
SN6000, HP SN6000 | SAN48B-5 |
Learn | |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | IBM |
Overview | |
The HPE SN6000 Stackable 8Gb Fibre Channel switch is designed to make Enterprise SANs affordable and easy to use, especially as the network expands. Built with low-cost, high-performance scalability in mind, each SN6000 features 20 device ports supporting 8/4/2 Gbps speeds, plus 4 high-speed 10/20 Gbps stacking ports for linking SN6000 switches. | The IBM System Storage SAN48B-5 switch is designed to meet the demands of hyper-scale private or hybrid cloud storage environments by delivering Gen 5 Fibre Channel technology and capabilities with 16 Gbps performance that support highly virtualized environments. To enable greater flexibility and investment protection, SAN48B-5 is configurable up to 48 ports and supports speeds up to 16 Gbps in a designed 1U package. |
Offer | |
Learn more about HPE SN6000 | Learn more about IBM SAN48B-5 |
Sample Customers | |
Damm, Bank Simpanan Nasional, Weta Digital | CERN, Bigcommerce, Connect2Cloud, Genius Inside, Performance Buildings AG |
HPE SN6000 is ranked 5th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN48B-5 is ranked 6th in Enterprise SAN. HPE SN6000 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN48B-5 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, HPE SN6000 is most compared with Cisco MDS Series, INFINIDAT InfiniBox and NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS), whereas IBM SAN48B-5 is most compared with IBM SAN384B.
See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.