HPE SN6000 vs IBM SAN80B-4 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
353 views|307 comparisons
IBM Logo
15 views|7 comparisons
Ranking
4th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
353
Comparisons
307
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
15
Comparisons
7
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SN6000, HP SN6000
SAN80B-4
Learn More
Overview
The HPE SN6000 Stackable 8Gb Fibre Channel switch is designed to make Enterprise SANs affordable and easy to use, especially as the network expands. Built with low-cost, high-performance scalability in mind, each SN6000 features 20 device ports supporting 8/4/2 Gbps speeds, plus 4 high-speed 10/20 Gbps stacking ports for linking SN6000 switches.
The IBM 2498 SAN80B-4 Model B80 is a high-performance 8 Gbps FC switch designed for enterprise environments that require a high-port-count footprint for port aggregation and a simplified management environment that comes from reducing the total number of domains.
Sample Customers
Damm, Bank Simpanan Nasional, Weta Digital
City of Joensuu, Six Flags Entertainment, VolkerHighways, Front-Safe A/S, DLF Ltd., Clinica Las Condes
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Manufacturing Company12%
Media Company9%
Comms Service Provider9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise53%
No Data Available

HPE SN6000 is ranked 4th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN80B-4 is ranked 15th in Enterprise SAN. HPE SN6000 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN80B-4 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, HPE SN6000 is most compared with Cisco MDS Series, Dell Connectrix and IBM SAN24B-4 Express, whereas IBM SAN80B-4 is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.