Compare HPE SN6000 vs. IBM SAN80B-4
Ranking  | |
Views 294 Comparisons 232 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 38 Comparisons 23 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 55% of the time.  Compared 27% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| SN6000, HP SN6000 | SAN80B-4 |
Learn | |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise | IBM |
Overview | |
| The HPE SN6000 Stackable 8Gb Fibre Channel switch is designed to make Enterprise SANs affordable and easy to use, especially as the network expands. Built with low-cost, high-performance scalability in mind, each SN6000 features 20 device ports supporting 8/4/2 Gbps speeds, plus 4 high-speed 10/20 Gbps stacking ports for linking SN6000 switches. | The IBM 2498 SAN80B-4 Model B80 is a high-performance 8 Gbps FC switch designed for enterprise environments that require a high-port-count footprint for port aggregation and a simplified management environment that comes from reducing the total number of domains. |
Offer | |
Learn more about HPE SN6000 | Learn more about IBM SAN80B-4 |
Sample Customers | |
| Damm, Bank Simpanan Nasional, Weta Digital | City of Joensuu, Six Flags Entertainment, VolkerHighways, Front-Safe A/S, DLF Ltd., Clinica Las Condes |
HPE SN6000 is ranked 5th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN80B-4 is ranked 11th in Enterprise SAN. HPE SN6000 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN80B-4 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, HPE SN6000 is most compared with Cisco MDS Series, INFINIDAT InfiniBox and NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS), whereas IBM SAN80B-4 is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.