HPE Synergy vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
4,758 views|3,441 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Lenovo Logo
views| comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Synergy and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Nutanix platform came in a little more expensive than the Synergy."
  • "The solution has reduced our IT infrastructure costs because we have had to buy less services than we used to."
  • "In our whole environment, the cost is in the millions. On this particular chassis, the annual cost is 12 blades times approximately $40,000."
  • "The biggest cost is the VMware licensing."
  • "We do a biannual renewal. I know how much that renewal is, but I don't know how much it breaks down to be just Synergy, since we have our VMware, all of our physical equipment, etc. all rolled up into one renewal, which is a little over $300,000 every two years. However, only a subset of that is the Synergy product."
  • "There was at least about a 20 percent savings in cost over our purchase based on the purchase price of the compute modules themselves versus what we've had to pay before. It was significantly less."
  • "Synergy has lowered our total cost of ownership significantly. I would say ballpark around 25 percent, maybe more."
  • "We bought everything outright to start with. We don't do much consumption-based stuff."
  • More HPE Synergy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:It is a good product for hypervisors.
    Top Answer:You have to propose Synergy with your customer base.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    4,758
    Comparisons
    3,441
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.3
    Unranked
    In Blade Servers
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
    Learn More
    Overview

    HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.

    Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.
    Sample Customers
    HudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United
    Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise25%
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE Synergy is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 85 reviews while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. HPE Synergy is rated 8.4, while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Synergy writes "Local hard drives are not needed for the i3S module that boots to any operating system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] writes "Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment ". HPE Synergy is most compared with HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Apollo and HPE Superdome X, whereas Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.