Compare HPE System Management vs. Kaseya IT Center

HPE System Management is ranked 15th in Server Monitoring with 3 reviews while Kaseya IT Center is ranked 14th in Server Monitoring with 1 review. HPE System Management is rated 8.0, while Kaseya IT Center is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE System Management writes "Good management and monitoring of servers and very good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya IT Center writes "Easy to learn and use with a helpful level of automation". HPE System Management is most compared with , whereas Kaseya IT Center is most compared with SCCM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Kaseya IT Center? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Zabbix, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: August 2020.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work.The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version.This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning.

More HPE System Management Pros »

It is a product that is very easy to learn.

More Kaseya IT Center Pros »

Cons
If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier.Our customers would like to see the price lowered.The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved.

More HPE System Management Cons »

At times, there is degradation in performance.

More Kaseya IT Center Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent.

More HPE System Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
out of 37 in Server Monitoring
Views
162
Comparisons
87
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
328
Avg. Rating
8.0
14th
out of 37 in Server Monitoring
Views
383
Comparisons
301
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
414
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
System Management, Operations Center, HP System ManagementIT Center
Learn
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Kaseya
Overview
HP System Management, is a solution that consolidates and correlates fault and performance events across your entire physical and virtual IT infrastructure.IT Center overcome IT complexity and manage your entire IT environment to improve service quality, increase efficiency, and deliver new services rapidly and securely. IT Center is a comprehensive IT management solution that allows IT departments and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to centrally manage and automate all of IT, from a single console.
Offer
Learn more about HPE System Management
Learn more about Kaseya IT Center
Sample Customers
Infotec1st Community Federal Credit Union, AMC, All Coveredês, Atlanta Technology Force, Babcockês, Baker Triangle, BankFirst, Beltone New England, Big Brothers Big Sisters
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Zabbix, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: August 2020.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.