Compare HPE System Management vs. Pandora FMS

HPE System Management is ranked 25th in Server Monitoring with 1 review while Pandora FMS which is ranked 6th in Server Monitoring with 13 reviews. HPE System Management is rated 0, while Pandora FMS is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of HPE System Management writes "Predictive analysis and other features have helped us to improve our efficiency". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pandora FMS writes "Single-point continuous supervision makes it efficient for detecting and solving problems". HPE System Management is most compared with Kaseya IT Center, whereas Pandora FMS is most compared with Zabbix, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and Opsview Monitor.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Nagios, CA Technologies and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: August 2019.
361,263 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning.

Read more »

Pandora FMS provides us with a general report (graphical) about all of the connected devices, which helps with planning new stations and tracking them.The solution is so lightweight that with only 4GB of ram, it allows keeping track of up to two hundred agents from a single console.Thanks to its flexibility, I have been able to adapt the tool to our servers and find out quickly how their console works.The official forum is active enough to answer most of the high-end technical questions that you may have.This solution has screens that are easy to understand and provide a wealth of information.I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly.It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain.What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it.

Read more »

Cons
The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved.

Read more »

It would be useful if Pandora FMS included an ISO image (or «software appliance») for each big company that leases virtual private machines (VPS), just like in AWS.When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious.I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring.Pandora FMS is an overall great monitoring solution, but it does not have a community that is as large as Zabbix or Nagios.I would like to have a dashboard with all assets displayed, with a quick hover-over status.I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity.I think some improvements to the Android app would be good.The price for Pandora FMS is expensive.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available.The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest.In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study.My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition.You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules.Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive.Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
361,263 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
25th
out of 33 in Server Monitoring
Views
414
Comparisons
105
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
91
Avg. Rating
N/A
6th
out of 33 in Server Monitoring
Views
1,135
Comparisons
477
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
373
Avg. Rating
9.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 51% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
System Management, Operations Center, HP System Management
Learn
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas
Overview
HP System Management, is a solution that consolidates and correlates fault and performance events across your entire physical and virtual IT infrastructure.

Pandora FMS Enterprise is the perfect on-premise monitoring software for companies with at least 100 devices. 

Stop wasting your time and resources on complex and silo'd monitoring systems that are poorly integrated.

It’s an all-in-one package offering modern and flexible IT monitoring, replacing the need for multiple, difficult-to-integrate, and more costly monitoring systems.

Offer
Learn more about HPE System Management
Learn more about Pandora FMS
Sample Customers
InfotecRakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Engineering Company81%
Recreational Facilities And Services Company6%
Software R&D Company6%
Healthcare Company2%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business99%
Large Enterprise1%
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Nagios, CA Technologies and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: August 2019.
361,263 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email