Compare HPE System Management vs. SCCM

HPE System Management is ranked 15th in Server Monitoring with 3 reviews while SCCM is ranked 1st in Server Monitoring with 11 reviews. HPE System Management is rated 8.0, while SCCM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE System Management writes "Good management and monitoring of servers and very good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCCM writes "It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer". HPE System Management is most compared with , whereas SCCM is most compared with Ansible, BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Ivanti Patch for Windows and Chef. See our HPE System Management vs. SCCM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SCCM Logo
Read 11 SCCM reviews.
42,843 views|28,355 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE System Management vs. SCCM and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work.The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version.This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning.

More HPE System Management Pros »

Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace.Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching.The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging.The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching.This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD.This has made the management of our environment easier.This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system.The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur.

More SCCM Pros »

Cons
If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier.Our customers would like to see the price lowered.The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved.

More HPE System Management Cons »

We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users.The main room for improvement is the on-screen display. I think it would be good if some improvements were made.The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool.The cost of the product can be improved.This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems.Not everything is readily available, and there are a lot of commands that are only executable via PowerShell.This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections.I would like to see an agentless version of the solution.

More SCCM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent.

More HPE System Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free.Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing.

More SCCM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
out of 37 in Server Monitoring
Views
162
Comparisons
87
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
328
Avg. Rating
8.0
1st
out of 37 in Server Monitoring
Views
42,843
Comparisons
28,355
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
515
Avg. Rating
8.1
Popular Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
System Management, Operations Center, HP System ManagementSystem Center Configuration Manager
Learn
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Microsoft
Overview
HP System Management, is a solution that consolidates and correlates fault and performance events across your entire physical and virtual IT infrastructure.With System Center Configuration Manager, you can manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving your employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose.
Offer
Learn more about HPE System Management
Learn more about SCCM
Sample Customers
InfotecBank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company22%
Construction Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government8%
Retailer5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise83%
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE System Management vs. SCCM and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.