We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The reliability is good."
"The performance is good."
"The actual wireless access points themselves are very powerful."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"The technical features are very good and it's very useful if you need a wireless solution."
"Ruckus has multiple radios. Therefore, it supports high speed for users and clients. Other vendors have fluctuations in speed. The main thing about Ruckus is that you can trust it and rely on its speed. I am simply satisfied with it."
"The performance of this solution is amazing in terms of radiofrequency technology."
"The initial setup of Ruckus Wireless WAN is very easy."
"Provides great coverage and performance."
"Tech support is good."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"It should be a faster device."
"Scalability is an aspect of this product that should be improved."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"I believe there is room for improvement in the price structure."
"Technical support is something that needs to be improved."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Pricing is an area for improvement. The devices are relatively expensive."
"The solution could be more stable."
"There could be more power supply for the radio features."
"So far, I find Ruckus Wireless WAN okay in terms of the technology and existing business network, but licensing could be more flexible, especially the IoT license that was changed to adapt to the IoT Controller and sensor subscription. The previous licensing method for Ruckus Wireless WAN was better. In my opinion, it wasn't a good decision to change it because the customer prefers the previous licensing over the current licensing. It's not only about the money in terms of licensing, but also about flexibility. The latest license change isn't as flexible. I also found the cloud solution not partner-friendly, so that could also be improved. Another area for improvement in Ruckus Wireless WAN is answering partner requests because currently, it doesn't seem easy for them. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is the AP having its MQTT forwarder. Ruckus Wireless WAN AP supports IoT modules now and to use the IoT modules, you need all IoT data to pass through the IoT Controller. If I could forward that IoT data directly to my environment, similar to what you can do with other solutions, that would be great."
"The pricing needs to be reconsidered because it's expensive."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 16 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
