We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The performance is good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The reliability is good."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"The setup is quite simple."
"It's a well priced solution and as far as I'm concerned, it's enterprise class."
"I have found the most valuable features to be how user-friendly it is and how simple it is to do the configurations."
"It is a highly scalable platform."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"The UniFi Controller Software provides excellent statistical and monitoring facilities."
"We have not had an issue with Ubiquiti Wireless since we have been using it. The solution is highly reliable."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"I would like to see more cloud features that some of the other competitors such as Cisco Meraki have that are very nice."
"This product has issues with scalability and ease of manageability at scale. Security also needs to be improved, when compared to its competitors. Ubiquiti Wireless doesn't have any support that you can call. They only have an online portal where you can access support documentation, but it's not great. You have to figure out issues and solutions for yourself."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve by being more user-friendly and easy to use."
"Tech support is mostly remote and could be better."
"The product lacks some security features."
"I would like local support from the parent company."
"Could be more secure and the controller more user-friendly."
"The production is not very stable in our experience."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 16 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.