Huawei eSight vs SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Huawei Logo
1,447 views|1,083 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
SolarWinds Logo
328 views|254 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Huawei eSight and SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Management Applications Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"eSight allows me to monitor and solve any problem in the backbone and any switch in real-time.""We can scale the solution.""The most important features are alarm management and the visualization of the health of our network devices.""We use Huawei eSight to monitor devices like Wi-Fi controllers, LAN switches, and routers.""The product is stable.""Huawei eSight provides businesses with monitoring capabilities of network devices across your network.""I like the real-time location monitor or RTLS feature. It is similar to the monitoring feature in Cisco Prime.""I like that it supports all our Huawei devices. Unlike other network monitoring tools that monitor Huawei devices, it provides more details when it comes to monitoring or management. We can get complete details about the devices, and management is also simple."

More Huawei eSight Pros →

Cons
"It is not a very flexible product.""The price could be less costly.""It will be better if they can make the simple network topology part more presentable. It would also be better if they had API integration and integration with third-party devices.""The solution and the operating system come separately. It would be easier if we did not have to deploy anything. A bundle feature would be better.""This solution could be improved by offering monitoring for all devices and not only Huawei devices.""The solution needs to improve it's user interface to make it more modern and stylish. They need to design proper menu positions, features, etc. Right now the layout is complicated.""Something that could be improved is the lack of integration with Cisco switches. In the next release, I would like to see better reporting.""eSight has many features and options, but sometimes, we feel that it should be more advanced, like Cisco. It would be good if they can enable some automation part in eSight. Most of our customers want automation in their network. They don't want a dependency on everything. That's why the automation part must be improved in Huawei. It will be beneficial for customers. Cisco has different products, and there are multiple products for monitoring, automation, etc. In the software-defined network, Cisco has ACI, and VMware has NSX. Such options must be there in Huawei to move to a software-defined network. Unlike Cisco, in the case of eSight, there is only one product. I am not aware of any other product. It would be good to enhance it with at least some automation options so that we can use it effectively in the campus network or big data center environment. When I implemented this Huawei solution, I faced some limitations in particular areas like wireless scanning. This is another part that they can improve. Wireless reporting option is not as effective as other monitoring solutions. For a particular use case, if a customer is asking for some reports, sometimes they are not 100% satisfactory. The reporting structure must be improved."

More Huawei eSight Cons →

"This is a relatively expensive product."

More SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its pricing is better than any other Huawei product. Some products are cheaper in Huawei, and some products are cheaper in Cisco. Cisco has more benefits and options than Huawei if you consider different network environments."
  • "Pricing depends on the competition. If your competitor is like Cisco, then Huawei is much more competitive when it comes to pricing."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing. The pricing depends on which features you use and can become expensive."
  • More Huawei eSight Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Huawei eSight to monitor devices like Wi-Fi controllers, LAN switches, and routers.
    Top Answer:The solution and the operating system come separately. It would be easier if we did not have to deploy anything. A bundle feature would be better.
    Top Answer:Huawei eSight is used for infrastructure monitoring and normally works with the Huawei product line only. It is not a generic tool that can work with all devices.
    Top Answer:Licensing costs are on the expensive side.
    Top Answer:The Network Topology Mapper is on the expensive side - it would be helpful if it were less so.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,447
    Comparisons
    1,083
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    6.7
    Views
    328
    Comparisons
    254
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    147
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SolarWinds NTM
    Learn More
    SolarWinds
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Huawei's eSight is a unified software suite for planning, operating, and maintaining complex enterprise ICT infrastructure from global, converged networks and data centers to multimedia and video communications that includes the facilities necessary for delivering performance and IT services. eSight provides a platform that supports infrastructure and devices from third-party providers, to develop custom management applications and improves O&M efficiency.

    Automate device discovery and mapping
    Build multiple maps from a single scan
    Export network diagrams to Visio
    Auto-detect changes to network topology
    Perform multi-level network discovery
    Address regulatory PCI compliance

    Sample Customers
    Marina Bay, CITIC Pacific Mining
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government13%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Management Applications
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Huawei eSight is ranked 11th in Network Management Applications with 8 reviews while SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper is ranked 16th in Network Management Applications with 1 review. Huawei eSight is rated 6.8, while SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Huawei eSight writes "Useful RTLS feature and good support but needs automation options and better wireless reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper writes "Very user-friendly and stable". Huawei eSight is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, Cisco Prime, Zabbix and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper is most compared with Fortinet FortiManager, Cisco DNA Center and Aruba Airwave.

    See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

    We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.