Compare Huawei OceanStor 9000 vs. Panasas ActiveStor

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Dell EMC and others in NAS. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is cheaper than other solutions."

More Huawei OceanStor 9000 Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
11th
out of 26 in NAS
Views
1,629
Comparisons
1,076
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
218
Rating
8.0
17th
out of 26 in NAS
Views
337
Comparisons
278
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OceanStor 9000 Scale-out NASActiveStor
Learn
Huawei
Panasas
Overview

OceanStor 9000 is a scale-out NAS storage system specifically designed for massive data storage.

It employs a fully symmetric distributed architecture, supports either file or object storage, and delivers superior performance, extensive scale-out capabilities, and super-large single file system for unstructured data storage. 

It is widely applied in media, satellite mapping, gene sequencing, energy exploration, scientific research, education, backup and archiving.

In our most recent product, the ActiveStor Ultra, Panasas has developed a new approach called Dynamic Data Acceleration Technology. It uses a carefully balanced set of HDDs, SATA SSD, NVMe SSD, NVDIMM, and DRAM to provide a combination of excellent performance and low cost per terabyte.

• HDDs will provide high bandwidth data storage if they are never asked to store anything small and only asked to do large sequential transfers. Therefore, we only store large Component Objects on our low-cost HDDs.

• SATA SSDs provide cost-effective and highbandwidth storage as a result of not having any seek times, so that’s where we keep our small Component Objects.

• NVMe SSDs are built for very low latency accesses, so we store all our metadata in a database and keep that database on an NVMe SSD. Metadata accesses are very sensitive to latency, whether it is POSIX metadata for the files being stored or metadata for the internal operations of the OSD.

• An NVDIMM (a storage class memory device) is the lowest latency type of persistent storage device available, and we use one to store our transaction logs: user data and metadata being written by the application to the OSD, plus our internal metadata. That allows PanFS to provide very low latency commits back to the application.

• We use the DRAM in each OSD as an extremely low latency cache of the most recently read or written data and metadata.

To gain the most benefit from the SATA SSD’s performance, we try to keep the SATA SSD about 80% full. If it falls below that, we will (transparently and in the background) pick the smallest Component Objects in the HDD pool and move them to the SSD until it is about 80% full. If the SSD is too full, we will move the largest Component Objects on the SSD to the HDD pool. Every ActiveStor Ultra Storage Node performs this optimization independently and continuously. It’s easy for an ActiveStor Ultra to pick which Component Objects to move, it just needs to look in its local NVMe-based database.

Offer
Learn more about Huawei OceanStor 9000
Learn more about Panasas ActiveStor
Sample Customers
Piraeus, Clinique Univeritaires Saint-Luc, Absolut Bank Advanced Mask Technology Center Airbus Argonne National Laboratory The University of Texas at Dallas School of Arts Technology and Emerging Communication Башнефть Boeing Bosch California Academy of Sciences Caltech Canon Case Western Reserve University Conoco Phillips Deluxe DirecTV Fairfield Technologies United States Federal Reserve Garvan Institute of Medical Research Goodyear Halliburton Harvard Medical School Honeywell In-Depth Geophysical Intel Kawasaki Lockheed Martin 3M Magseis Fairfield Mammal Studios The Man Group McLaren Mercedes-Benz MINES ParisTech NASA US Navy National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center NBCUniversal National Institutes of Health Nio National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Northrup Grumman Novartis Partners Healthcare Procter & Gamble PGS Pratt & Whitney Rutherford Appleton Lab Siemens Sim International Sinopec Solers Square Cnix TGS Toyota Motorsport GMBH Toppan Turner UMass Medical School United Technologies University of Georgia University of California Los Angeles University of Minnesota University of Notre Dame University of California San Diego Center for Microbiome Innovation Whiskytree
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider45%
Computer Software Company20%
Healthcare Company6%
Cloud Provider4%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Dell EMC and others in NAS. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Huawei OceanStor 9000 is ranked 11th in NAS with 1 review while Panasas ActiveStor is ranked 17th in NAS. Huawei OceanStor 9000 is rated 8.0, while Panasas ActiveStor is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Huawei OceanStor 9000 writes "It is stable and scalable". On the other hand, Huawei OceanStor 9000 is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, IBM Scale-out NAS, Buurst SoftNAS and HPE 3PAR StoreServ, whereas Panasas ActiveStor is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), Sonexion Scale-out Lustre Storage System, IBM FlashSystem and NetApp FAS Series.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.