Compare Huawei SoftCo vs. NetFortris Fonality Voice
Ranking  | |
Views 322 Comparisons 251 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 143 Comparisons 53 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 33% of the time. Compared 29% of the time.  Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time. | Compared 100% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| SoftCo | |
Learn | |
| Huawei | NetFortris |
Overview | |
| Huawei's unified communications solution is based on cutting-edge architecture, the solution not only provides open interfaces but a wide range of services. It is also very robust in terms of its maintainability. The solution basically consists of the following parts: a VoIP-based integrated switch SoftCo 9500/5816, a unified message server (SmartCall 1000), subscriber access equipment IAD, ET series IP phone terminals, a network element management system, a service management system, a billing management system, and etc. In addition, the solution provides a wide variety of unified communications services. | |
Offer | |
Learn more about Huawei SoftCo | Learn more about NetFortris Fonality Voice |
Sample Customers | |
| Beijing Electric Power Corporation, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Raiders, 76ers, RDAbbott |
Huawei SoftCo is ranked 13th in Unified Communications while NetFortris Fonality Voice is ranked 18th in Unified Communications. Huawei SoftCo is rated 0.0, while NetFortris Fonality Voice is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Huawei SoftCo is most compared with Cisco Unified Communications, Cisco Jabber, 3CX and ADTRAN NetVanta, whereas NetFortris Fonality Voice is most compared with 3CX.
See our list of best Unified Communications vendors and best IP Telephony & Unified Communications vendors.
We monitor all Unified Communications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.