We performed a comparison between Fivetran and SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."
"The portal is very intuitive and easy to use."
"Fivetran can perform data migration incredibly fast, depending on the source and target."
"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."
"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."
"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."
"Its arrays are powerful enough to handle migrations even when the replication is happening in the background, without causing any trouble with the ongoing traffic."
"The most valuable feature of the SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is the replication. We normally set it up to avoid any kind of data loss."
"Some of the pain points we're looking at are trying to integrate some of the items in the Microsoft stack, so SharePoint and Excel, and then some of the newer Azure services."
"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."
"The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums."
"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."
"The documentation can be laid out better to make it easier to find things, and I really wish there was built-in support for changing passwords. Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results."
"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."
"The connections with SAP must be improved."
"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."
"SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is a continuous process. However, during upgrades, there may be differences between the primary and SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server, requiring us to stop the replication. The Replication Server must have support for the database version, regardless of where it is being replicated from. Even if the database versions do not match, replication should still occur."
Fivetran is ranked 3rd in Data Replication with 19 reviews while SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is ranked 14th in Data Replication with 1 review. Fivetran is rated 8.0, while SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Fivetran writes "Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server writes "Useful data loss prevention, but upgrading requires replication halting ". Fivetran is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Azure Data Factory, Oracle GoldenGate and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
