Compare Hyland OnBase vs. M-Files

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland OnBase Logo
4,084 views|3,028 comparisons
M-Files Logo
1,589 views|1,299 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

More Hyland OnBase Pros »

"Using M-Files means anybody on the executive team to go in and immediately look at a dashboard and know the status of a contract."

More M-Files Pros »

Cons
"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase Cons »

"The integration with other products needs to be improved."

More M-Files Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice »

"They have an Optical Character Scanning module but we didn't buy it because it's ridiculously expensive."

More M-Files Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,084
Comparisons
3,028
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
681
Rating
N/A
Views
1,589
Comparisons
1,299
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
786
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OnBase
Learn More
Overview
OnBase enterprise content management software combines integrated document management, business process management and records management in a single application. Whether deployed as a hosted or premises-based solution, OnBase allows organizations to automate business processes and reduce the time and cost of performing important business functions through the management and control of content.

M-Files provides a next generation intelligent information management platform that improves business performance by helping people find and use information more effectively. Unlike traditional enterprise content management (ECM) systems or content services platforms, M-Files unifies systems, data and content across the organization without disturbing existing systems and processes or requiring data migration. M-Files breaks down silos by delivering an in-context experience for accessing and leveraging information that resides in any system and repository, including network folders, SharePoint, file sharing services, ECM systems, CRM, ERP and other business systems and repositories. Thousands of organizations in over 100 countries use M-Files for managing their business information and processes, including NBC Universal, Rovio and SAS.

M-Files website
Offer
Learn more about Hyland OnBase
Learn more about M-Files
Sample Customers
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Comcast, Rovio, OMV, Sagem, UNEP, Elekta, Caverion, SAS, HCP, Yokohama
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider7%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider24%
Construction Company8%
Media Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hyland OnBase is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while M-Files is ranked 7th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review. Hyland OnBase is rated 0.0, while M-Files is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "A remarkable all-in-one platform with amazing stability and scalability and good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of M-Files writes "Good workflows, and it is easy to use with a dashboard that improves contract visibility". Hyland OnBase is most compared with OpenText Content Suite Platform, SharePoint, Hyland Perceptive Content, IBM FileNet and Box, whereas M-Files is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.