Hyland OnBase vs Oracle Content Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hyland OnBase and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the cloud and its integrability.""OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year.""We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide.""The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.""The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents.""The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

More Hyland OnBase Pros →

"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."

More Oracle Content Management Pros →

Cons
"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly.""We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated.""We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution.""An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution.""For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions.""The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

More Hyland OnBase Cons →

"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."

More Oracle Content Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
  • "OnBase is reasonably priced."
  • "There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."
  • "The tool's price is high."
  • More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
    Top Answer:We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated.
    Top Answer:It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.
    Top Answer:Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration.
    Top Answer:We use Content Management to supervise and control document access within our management structure. This involves establishing measures to efficiently manage and govern the content. Our approach… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,769
    Comparisons
    1,713
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    439
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    851
    Comparisons
    750
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    627
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OnBase
    Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    OnBase provides a broad spectrum of turn-key industry and departmental solutions that are expertly tailored to meet specific business challenges. As an enterprise platform, OnBase has purpose-built integrations and connectors to core industry LOB applications such as Epic and Workday, supporting critical content and process solutions. With repeatable industry solutions, OnBase provides the capability to intelligently automate your business processes so your team can focus on higher value work without the need to build costly customized solutions. With business ownership of solutions, OnBase enables expansion beyond IT, delivering faster ROI.

    Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

    Sample Customers
    Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
    TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Educational Organization8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hyland OnBase is ranked 8th in Enterprise Content Management with 8 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 8.0, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "Stable content and workflow management solution with a valuable retention module". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Hyland OnBase is most compared with Alfresco, SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM and IBM FileNet, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.