Hyland OnBase vs QualiWare X comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland Logo
605 views|360 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
QualiWare Logo
122 views|75 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hyland OnBase and QualiWare X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. QualiWare X Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed.""The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents.""We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide.""OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year.""I like the cloud and its integrability.""The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

More Hyland OnBase Pros →

"I like the solution's traceability."

More QualiWare X Pros →

Cons
"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution.""The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly.""The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market.""We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution.""For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions.""We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

More Hyland OnBase Cons →

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

More QualiWare X Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
  • "OnBase is reasonably priced."
  • "There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."
  • "The tool's price is high."
  • More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."
  • More QualiWare X Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
    Top Answer:We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated.
    Top Answer:I like the solution's traceability.
    Top Answer:I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive.
    Top Answer:The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling.
    Ranking
    Views
    605
    Comparisons
    360
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    439
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    122
    Comparisons
    75
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    223
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OnBase
    Learn More
    Overview

    OnBase provides a broad spectrum of turn-key industry and departmental solutions that are expertly tailored to meet specific business challenges. As an enterprise platform, OnBase has purpose-built integrations and connectors to core industry LOB applications such as Epic and Workday, supporting critical content and process solutions. With repeatable industry solutions, OnBase provides the capability to intelligently automate your business processes so your team can focus on higher value work without the need to build costly customized solutions. With business ownership of solutions, OnBase enables expansion beyond IT, delivering faster ROI.

    QualiWare enables positive change by providing tools and methods that ensure coherency, consensus and consistency, and we support the agile and innovative company in handling complex knowledge, maintained by multiple persons with different backgrounds, in a continuous process.
    Sample Customers
    Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
    Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government12%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government31%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Media Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Hyland OnBase vs. QualiWare X
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hyland OnBase is ranked 25th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 8 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 36th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 8.0, while QualiWare X is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "Stable content and workflow management solution with a valuable retention module". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". Hyland OnBase is most compared with Alfresco, SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM and IBM FileNet, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, iServer, Avolution ABACUS and ARIS Cloud. See our Hyland OnBase vs. QualiWare X report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.