Hyland OnBase vs TietoEVRY Public 360 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland Logo
2,721 views|1,677 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
TietoEVRY Logo
358 views|149 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hyland OnBase and TietoEVRY Public 360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
  • "OnBase is reasonably priced."
  • "There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."
  • "The tool's price is high."
  • More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
    Top Answer:We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,721
    Comparisons
    1,677
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    439
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    358
    Comparisons
    149
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OnBase
    Software Innovation Public 360
    Learn More
    Overview

    OnBase provides a broad spectrum of turn-key industry and departmental solutions that are expertly tailored to meet specific business challenges. As an enterprise platform, OnBase has purpose-built integrations and connectors to core industry LOB applications such as Epic and Workday, supporting critical content and process solutions. With repeatable industry solutions, OnBase provides the capability to intelligently automate your business processes so your team can focus on higher value work without the need to build costly customized solutions. With business ownership of solutions, OnBase enables expansion beyond IT, delivering faster ROI.

    Public 360° is improving everyday work in the public sector for the good of citizen services

    We build on decades of experience as the preferred provider of digital services to the public sector. We are the only supplier that offers the entire portfolio of case processing, archive and document management, and planning & construction case processing. We work with the premise providers in the public sector to support the digitalization strategies in the Nordics. With thousands professional consultants in Tietoevry you always have the strongest ICT environment behind you.

    Put an end to time wasted looking for documents across several platforms and gain a clear overview of your organisation's workflow. Public 360° stores all your project or case records in one place, making it easy to find, share and update information. Tracking progress has never been so easy.

    We've built it to comply with all Nordic regulations around records and case management, including GDPR. With Microsoft Office integration and the ability to automate processes, it offers you a one-stop-shop for an efficient and transparent administration that puts the community first.

    Sample Customers
    Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
    Avinor, City of Bergen, Cross-County Cooperation, Kung_lv Local Administration, Municipality of Bergen, Omsorgsbygg, Oppland County, Sarpsborg Local Administration,Sarpsborg Municipality, Skien Municipality, Srum Municipality, Statnett, Stockholm City Planning Administration, The Danish Coastal Authority, The Danish Immigration Service, The Danish Parlament, The Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government12%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government23%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Media Company9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hyland OnBase is ranked 8th in Enterprise Content Management with 8 reviews while TietoEVRY Public 360 is ranked 22nd in Enterprise Content Management. Hyland OnBase is rated 8.0, while TietoEVRY Public 360 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "Stable content and workflow management solution with a valuable retention module". On the other hand, Hyland OnBase is most compared with Alfresco, SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM and IBM FileNet, whereas TietoEVRY Public 360 is most compared with SharePoint.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.