Hyland Perceptive Content vs. IBM FileNet Comparison

Hyland Perceptive Content

IBM FileNet

Hyland Perceptive Content

1,330 views|875 comparisons

IBM FileNet

Read 31 IBM FileNet reviews.

12,421 views|6,156 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Use Hyland Perceptive Content? Share your opinion.

SolomonChris

Founder at intellicon systems

The taxonomy feature helps with compliance and ISO

We are using FileNet to increase the efficiency of our collaboration and in our organization overall. It has improved the decision-making... Read more »

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information Not Available

"1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform.""The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year.""Talking about the cost is difficult because IBM has offers that combine different products, and each of these offers has different types of licensing. IBM also has a policy that the actual price for a given customer may be very different from the stated book price. It's hard to say whether it's expensive or not.""My customers have seen ROI. There have been productivity gains, time savings gains, and things that they have been doing much more efficiently in a more modern way than they were before.""It has reduced operating costs by reducing the amount of manual work needed.""We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency.""The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do.""Yearly, we pay for the maintenance, which is $20,000."

More IBM FileNet Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question Earn 20 points	What do you like most about IBM FileNet? Top Answer: I like the security and also the configuration. It is easy to configure and most of our business use cases have everything just with the configuration itself. Read all 35 answers What needs improvement with IBM FileNet? Top Answer: Developers like us have an upgraded interface. That interface does not work in the process that we have today. It hangs and is not user-friendly. Read all 35 answers What is your primary use case for IBM FileNet? Top Answer: We use it to document content management. We have a payment system for every corporate payment that goes through our bank, it has to go through our application. We use it for the business process… more » Read all 37 answers
Ranking
5th out of 23 in Document Management Software Views 1,330 Comparisons 875 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A	2nd out of 39 in Enterprise Content Management Views 12,421 Comparisons 6,156 Reviews 31 Average Words per Review 773 Rating 8.3
Popular Comparisons
Hyland OnBase vs. Hyland Perceptive Content Compared 53% of the time. SharePoint vs. Hyland Perceptive Content Compared 15% of the time. Laserfiche Rio vs. Hyland Perceptive Content Compared 9% of the time. OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. Hyland Perceptive Content Compared 8% of the time. Alfresco vs. Hyland Perceptive Content Compared 7% of the time. See more Hyland Perceptive Content competitors » + Add more products to compare	SharePoint vs. IBM FileNet Compared 23% of the time. IBM ECM vs. IBM FileNet Compared 17% of the time. OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. IBM FileNet Compared 15% of the time. OpenText Documentum vs. IBM FileNet Compared 10% of the time. Alfresco vs. IBM FileNet Compared 6% of the time. See more IBM FileNet competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
ImageNow
Learn
Hyland	IBM
Overview
ImageNow start by eliminating one of the biggest barriers to greater productivity unmanaged content creation. Perceptive Capture puts content under control from the moment of its creation or capture.	IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle. There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.
Offer
Learn more about Hyland Perceptive Content Learn More	Learn more about IBM FileNet Learn More
Sample Customers
Columbia Sportwear	Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company38% Government9% Comms Service Provider6% Retailer6%	REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm34% Insurance Company17% Healthcare Company11% Comms Service Provider8% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company35% Comms Service Provider16% Insurance Company8% Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available	REVIEWERS Small Business23% Midsize Enterprise12% Large Enterprise65%

Hyland Perceptive Content is ranked 5th in Document Management Software while IBM FileNet is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 31 reviews. Hyland Perceptive Content is rated 0.0, while IBM FileNet is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "Easy to integrate, and enables our clients to guarantee compliance". Hyland Perceptive Content is most compared with Hyland OnBase, SharePoint, Laserfiche Rio, OpenText Content Suite Platform and Alfresco, whereas IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, IBM ECM, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum and Alfresco.

See our list of .

We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Compare Hyland Perceptive Content vs. IBM FileNet