Compare Hyperledger Fabric vs. NEO

Hyperledger Fabric is ranked 1st in Blockchain Development Platforms while NEO is ranked 6th in Blockchain Development Platforms. Hyperledger Fabric is rated 0, while NEO is rated 0. On the other hand, Hyperledger Fabric is most compared with Microsoft Azure Blockchain as a Service, SAP Cloud Platform Blockchain and IBM Blockchain as a Service, whereas NEO is most compared with Hyperledger Fabric.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyperledger Fabric Logo
1,671 views|1,523 comparisons
NEO Logo
28 views|19 comparisons
Ranking
Views
1,671
Comparisons
1,523
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
28
Comparisons
19
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Learn
Hyperledger
NEO
Video Not Available
Overview

Hyperledger Fabric is a blockchain framework implementation and one of the Hyperledger projects hosted by The Linux Foundation. Intended as a foundation for developing applications or solutions with a modular architecture, Hyperledger Fabric allows components, such as consensus and membership services, to be plug-and-play. Hyperledger Fabric leverages container technology to host smart contracts called “chaincode” that comprise the application logic of the system. Hyperledger Fabric was initially contributed by Digital Asset and IBM, as a result of the first hackathon.

NEO is an open source project driven by the community. It utilizes blockchain technology and digital identities to digitize assets and automate the management of digital assets using smart contracts. Using a distributed network, it aims to create a "Smart Economy". NEO was founded in 2014 and open sourced on GitHub in June 2015. Its MainNet was released in October 2016 and has been running in stable capacity for two years. Its vision of a "smart economy" was set up along with the project rebranding in 2017.

Offer
Learn more about Hyperledger Fabric
Learn more about NEO
Sample Customers
Huawei, SecureKey Technologies, Loyyal, Everledger, BlocLedger, IT People Corporation, IntellectEU, CLS, Hitachi, DTCC, ANZ Banking Group Limited, HACERA, IBM
Information Not Available
We monitor all Blockchain Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.