• Home
  • i-MSCP vs. Sentora

Sentora vs i-MSCP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
i-MSCP Logo

i-MSCP

211 views|111 comparisons
Sentora Logo

Sentora

457 views|280 comparisons
Ranking
12th
out of 12 in Web Hosting Control Panel
Views
211
Comparisons
111
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 12 in Web Hosting Control Panel
Views
457
Comparisons
280
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
CentOS CWP logo
CentOS CWP vs. i-MSCP
Compared 53% of the time.
ISPConfig logo
ISPConfig vs. i-MSCP
Compared 47% of the time.
More i-MSCP Competitors   →
CentOS CWP logo
CentOS CWP vs. Sentora
Compared 80% of the time.
cPanel logo
cPanel vs. Sentora
Compared 20% of the time.
More Sentora Competitors   →
Learn More
i-MSCP
Video Not Available
Sentora
Video Not Available
Overview

Simplified management
Sentora is designed to simplify web hosting management, it gives your clients the ability to quickly and easily manage their web hosting.

Supported
We provide both community-based (free) and subscription-based premium support services to cater for both personal and commercial users!

Extendable
Our Add-ons store provides our users with a central repository to install, rate, sell and publish modules, themes and localisations.

Open-souce
Released under the GPLv3, Sentora is the perfect choice for the most small to medium ISPs looking for a cost effective, extendable platform.

i-MSCP is ranked 12th in Web Hosting Control Panel while Sentora is ranked 11th in Web Hosting Control Panel. i-MSCP is rated 0.0, while Sentora is rated 0.0. On the other hand, i-MSCP is most compared with CentOS CWP and ISPConfig, whereas Sentora is most compared with CentOS CWP and cPanel.

See our list of best Web Hosting Control Panel vendors.

We monitor all Web Hosting Control Panel reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.