We performed a comparison between i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."
"The solution has high support capability."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pros →
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
"The initial setup of Okta Workforce Identity is straightforward. I was able to get an environment ready within half a day."
"It's easy to use and straightforward."
"It is a very stable solution."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."
"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."
"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Cons →
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"There should be automated aggregation and complete classification processes included in it."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The training is too costly."
"SSO and MFA for improved end-user experience, and protection against password spray attacks, account password self-service."
"They also have single sign-on (SSO). When we bought Okta Workforce Identity a year and a half ago, I was also looking at SSO, but not much documentation was available for SSO. The documentation for SSO should be a little more robust for somebody who is implementing it for the first time."
"We still had to write several internal programs/scripts to complete the user-provisioning process. Okta does not have the ability to provision mailbox accounts for on-premise Exchange or in a hybrid O365 environment. The Group Push function from Okta to AD did not work reliably in our environment."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 26th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Authentication Systems vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.