We performed a comparison between i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and PingAccess based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management."The solution has high support capability."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pros →
"The solution is highly stable and scalable"
"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."
"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Cons →
"The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 24th in Access Management with 2 reviews while PingAccess is ranked 15th in Access Management with 1 review. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0, while PingAccess is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingAccess writes "A hybrid lightweight solution that simplifies web management ". i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas PingAccess is most compared with Symantec Siteminder and ForgeRock.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
