• Home
  • i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

RSA Adaptive Authentication vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server?
Andres Roldan
It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs
We are a partner who is supporting the application for our customers. Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
  • "Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
  • "Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
  • "The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."

    • More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    59th
    out of 105 in Authentication Systems
    Views
    47
    Comparisons
    38
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    25th
    out of 105 in Authentication Systems
    Views
    319
    Comparisons
    268
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    i-Sprint Innovations
    RSA
    Overview

    AccessMatrix™ Universal Authentication Server (UAS), is a comprehensive and versatile authentication server that enable organizations to centralize all its authentication schemes in a single unified platform. It is a future-proof authentication infrastructure that supports multiple authentication mechanisms (such as passwords, OTP, biometrics) for strong authentication and authorization requirements.

    UAS offers the freedom for organizations to deploy various authentication methods from different vendors under one platform, and manage it as a holistic security approach. This means organizations will not be restricted or locked to a specific hardware or software authentication solution. The use of Pluggable Authentication Module (PAM) approach also allows organizations to have ease of adding new methods when available on top of their existing scheme.

    RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
    Sample Customers
    AmBank Group, Cathay United Bank
    ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm47%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server is ranked 59th in Authentication Systems while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server is rated 0.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server is most compared with , whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and IBM Trusteer.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.