We performed a comparison between IBM API Connect and Oracle API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management."Scalable and stable API platform for creating and managing APIs."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is very easy to use and is something that is easily configurable."
"WSRR is a powerful component for getting the endpoints."
"The support is good and active. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"The most valuable features of IBM API Connect are its performance and user-friendliness."
"It allows enterprises to expose some of their tech to outside stakeholders."
"I have found the API Management to be most valuable."
"We really like the runtime capabilities of IBM API Connect. The creation of products and the control of the monetization and hit rate are some of the features which we've found very valuable."
"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."
"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."
"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."
"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."
"The integration of an API gateway that implements the sidecar pattern, which can be deployed in cloud applications, and expose the microservices directly in each pod, this can be more decentralized components."
"The design time setup has a lot of customizable fields, but we need certain standard fields to be added, such as what all of the consuming systems are. This needs to be very clearly articulated during the design time."
"It needs to be less taxing on compute resources."
"The new version is very unstable."
"They seem to have left out a feature for microservices and also a certification module for OIDC."
"Different versions of the same thing can mean unnecessary duplication."
"Due to bugs in integration, we have to look for workaround on fixing and using DataPower as gateway."
"Automation for our Domino applications could be improved."
"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."
"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."
"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."
"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."
IBM API Connect is ranked 5th in API Management with 73 reviews while Oracle API Management is ranked 20th in API Management with 5 reviews. IBM API Connect is rated 8.0, while Oracle API Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM API Connect writes "Good speed and performance, but it's based on a bit dated architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle API Management writes "Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure". IBM API Connect is most compared with Apigee, IBM DataPower Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Amazon API Gateway, whereas Oracle API Management is most compared with Apigee and Microsoft Azure API Management.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
