Compare IBM Application Performance Management vs. New Relic Browser

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Application Performance Management? Share your opinion.
Use New Relic Browser? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private.""This solution makes it a lot easier to figure out trends within very different data sources, which makes it easy to see why something is misbehaving.""The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities.""People are very pleased with the implementation.""The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation.""No issues with stability."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the breakdown that it provides, such as a description of the fields for a particular transaction."

More IBM Application Performance Management Pros »

"The solution is quite stable.""The most valuable features are infrastructure monitoring and application performance monitoring (APM)."

More New Relic Browser Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack.""I would like to see more out-of-the-box dashboards for in-depth application monitoring of standard products that are out there.""In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get.""The implementation is a long process that should be improved.""They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us.""It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Cons »

"Technical support can be slow and needs improvement."

More IBM Application Performance Management Cons »

"The solution does not provide input on how the page performs in a big group. It just says that the page performance is bad, but it does not say what can be done to improve it. If they could provide some insight or guidance on how to make improvements, that would be a big help.""It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available."

More New Relic Browser Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Educational pricing is available for this solution.""We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.""Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that.""This is an expensive product."

More New Relic Browser Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It’s in INR. Our data is on four sites and these are in the development phase. Different locations require different… more »
Top Answer: It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable features are infrastructure monitoring and application performance monitoring (APM).
Top Answer: The licensing cost is a little high and it should be brought down. It would help customers if there were an on-premises… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability IBM APM
Learn
VMware
IBM
New Relic
Overview

VMware Tanzu Observability provides metrics-driven analytics at massive scale, so you can get the most out of your cloud-native apps.

The IBM Application Performance Management portfolio provides visibility, control and automation of your mission-critical applications. It helps pinpoint the root cause of application's issue more quickly and resolve the problem. The integrated capabilities cover the five key areas: discovery, end-use experience, transaction tracking, enterprise diagnostics and analytics. It also easily monitors applications to ensure optimal performance to extend your hybrid management environment capabilities, to measure the customer experience from multiple locations and to further eliminate blind spots in your application environment.New Relic Browser provides deep visibility and actionable insights into real users' experiences on your website. With standard page load timing (sometimes referred to as real user monitoring or RUM), New Relic measures the overall time to load the entire webpage. However, New Relic Browser goes beyond RUM to also help you monitor the performance of individual sessions, AJAX requests, and JavaScript errors extending the monitoring throughout the entire life cycle of the page.
Offer
Learn more about VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront
Learn more about IBM Application Performance Management
Learn more about New Relic Browser
Sample Customers
Box, Intuit, Workday, Groupon, British Gas, SpaceApe, Marketo, DoordDash, LyftMibtree, EatDrinkDeals.com, IT Performance AdvisorFairfax Media, Despergar.com, MercadoLibre, Veracode, Costa Coffee, Kiva, Alkami, Mondia Media, Bringmeister.de, Simplesurance, Confused.com, ReachLocal, Lending Club, Boozt.com, Trainline
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company14%
Construction Company4%
Company Size
No Data Available
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Application Performance Management is ranked 34th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 1 review while New Relic Browser is ranked 32nd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. IBM Application Performance Management is rated 7.0, while New Relic Browser is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Application Performance Management writes "Provides valuable breakdown of information, but the agent negatively impacts server performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic Browser writes "Stable and scalable but does not provide input regarding page performance". IBM Application Performance Management is most compared with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager, AppDynamics, Dynatrace, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Compuware Strobe, whereas New Relic Browser is most compared with New Relic APM, Datadog, Akamai mPulse, Elastic APM and Aternity.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.