Compare IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders.""The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data.""The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."

More IBM B2B Integrator Pros »

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity.""The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable.""The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.""Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework.""The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration.""With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros »

Cons
"When working on an elaborate rule, I end up creating it in notepad and then pasting it into the Extended Rule window, which is not convenient.""The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough.""They do not have a solid partner ecosystem, and they do not have a clear roadmap for down the line; they're missing that clear roadmap."

More IBM B2B Integrator Cons »

"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved.""In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them.""The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.""It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development.""The older version of the solution will no longer be supported.""The cloud capability features need improvement.""I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible.""The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good.""The pricing for this solution is fine.""There are fees in addition to the licensing.""It's not an expensive solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data.
Top Answer: There are multiple kinds of offerings. If the customer is going to deploy on-premises, we have a perpetual license. If the customer is going to use the solution like a software as a service cloud… more »
Top Answer: The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough. There are other tools such as Dell Boomi that do not need as much coding. The initial setup can be made a… more »
Top Answer: The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution.
Top Answer: We centralize all interfaces that we need to have. However, we spend too much money and time to construct each interface. This is required due to the fact that the systems are outdated. We need to be… more »
Ranking
Views
3,271
Comparisons
1,775
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
546
Rating
8.0
Views
7,063
Comparisons
5,312
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
723
Rating
7.9
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
Learn More
Overview

IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
Offer
Learn more about IBM B2B Integrator
Learn more about SAP Process Orchestration
Sample Customers
Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Transportation Company15%
Logistics Company10%
Pharma/Biotech Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company22%
Energy/Utilities Company22%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company11%
Mining And Metals Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise78%
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 3rd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 10 reviews. IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "Great technical support with excellent integration capabilities and good scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "Gateway for all integrations that is stable and quick to install". IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, Mule ESB, Mule Anypoint Platform, Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, SAP Data Services, Boomi AtomSphere Integration and SAP Data Hub. See our IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.