IBM B2B Integrator vs. SWIFT InterAct

IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 27 reviews vs SWIFT InterAct which is ranked 12th in Business-to-Business Middleware. The top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "The number of self-service options and the transaction transparency are valuable features". IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Seeburger BIS, Mule ESB and Axway Integrator. SWIFT InterAct is most compared with SWIFTnet FIN, Mule ESB and webMethods Trading Networks.

IBM B2B Integrator

SWIFT InterAct

18500

IBM B2B Integrator

Based on 27 reviews.

20520

SWIFT InterAct

Most Helpful Review

Arun Prasanth

User at a tech services company

Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations

This solution supports almost all enterprise integrations and B2B/EDI protocols and messaging standards. It provides a clear roadmap and visibility... Read more »

Use SWIFT InterAct? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Avada Software, MuleSoft and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.

Download now

295,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM B2B Integrator vs. SWIFT InterAct

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 295,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	1st out of 33 In Business-to-Business Middleware Views 3,443 Comparisons 1,644 Reviews 27 Followers 180 Avg. Rating 7.8	12th out of 33 In Business-to-Business Middleware Views 660 Comparisons 503 Reviews 0 Followers 112 Avg. Rating N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Seeburger BIS vs. IBM B2B Integrator Compared 23% of the time. Mule ESB vs. IBM B2B Integrator Compared 19% of the time. Axway Integrator vs. IBM B2B Integrator Compared 16% of the time. See more IBM B2B Integrator competitors »	SWIFTnet FIN vs. SWIFT InterAct Compared 84% of the time. Mule ESB vs. SWIFT InterAct Compared 6% of the time. webMethods Trading Networks vs. SWIFT InterAct Compared 5% of the time. See more SWIFT InterAct competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As	IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite	InterAct
Website/Video
Website/Video	IBM	SWIFT
Overview
Overview	IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.	Online and mobile platform for financial service providers that enables consistent interaction between back office and contact center.
OFFER
Learn more about IBM B2B Integrator Learn More	Learn more about SWIFT InterAct Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital	Seceti
Top Industries
Top Industries	REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm 22% Transportation Company 17% Logistics Company 11% Pharma/Biotech Company 11% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Financial Services Firm 35% Logistics Company 12% Manufacturing Company 10% Retailer 7%	No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size	REVIEWERS Small Business 8% Midsize Enterprise 12% Large Enterprise 81% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business 6% Midsize Enterprise 4% Large Enterprise 90%	No Data Available

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Avada Software, MuleSoft and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.

Download now

295,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.