We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners."
"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."
"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."
"It's highly stable, and the redundancy is amazing. B2B Integrator also has a high availability option to work in a cluster environment. You rarely have issues operating it because of the HA."
"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."
"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"B2B provides a secure communication channel."
"The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."
"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."
"The reporting features could be better. right now, they are lacking a bit."
"There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry."
"They do not have a solid partner ecosystem, and they do not have a clear roadmap for down the line; they're missing that clear roadmap."
"The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with."
"Map translator needs more enhancements."
"API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud."
"The one thing that is lacking is easy visibility. It's hard to provide business users with a view into the statuses of their transactions."
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."
"I would like for them to work in real-time."
Earn 20 points
IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware. IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SAP Process Orchestration, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
