Compare IBM B2B Integrator vs. webMethods Trading Networks

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data.
Top Answer: There are multiple kinds of offerings. If the customer is going to deploy on-premises, we have a perpetual license. If the customer is going to use the solution like a software as a service cloud… more »
Top Answer: The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough. There are other tools such as Dell Boomi that do not need as much coding. The initial setup can be made a… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
3,271
Comparisons
1,775
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
546
Rating
8.0
Views
487
Comparisons
375
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
Learn More
Overview

IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

webMethods Trading Networks is a scalable, easy-to-manage gateway for doing business electronically with customers, distributors and trading partners worldwide. This enterprise class B2B gateway is built on webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) that automates B2B transactions, such as purchase requisitions, orders and invoices. 

Offer
Learn more about IBM B2B Integrator
Learn more about webMethods Trading Networks
Sample Customers
Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
Gist Limited, U.S. Bank, Staples
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Transportation Company15%
Logistics Company10%
Pharma/Biotech Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider22%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Media Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews while webMethods Trading Networks is ranked 15th in Business-to-Business Middleware. IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0, while webMethods Trading Networks is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "Great technical support with excellent integration capabilities and good scalability". On the other hand, IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, Mule ESB, SAP Process Orchestration, Mule Anypoint Platform and Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration, whereas webMethods Trading Networks is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, BizTalk Server and Mule ESB.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.