We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Informatica Cloud API and App Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has helped us automate business processes."
"IBM BPM should become cloud-native. It should also add a cloud deployment feature."
"This is one of the best tools to support the business and the way we work, and the numerous processes we need to implement."
"We are implementing the tool to triple our monthly transaction volume."
"IBM BPM is stable."
"IBM BPM's best features include document sharing, management document creation, widget and barcode creation, and integration."
"I liked its robustness the most. It was a very robust platform in my experience. It seemed like a very stable and powerful tool for handling lots of concurrent users and hammering at the system."
"Good user interface and good add option."
"The interface is really good."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"We have been experiencing bad performance and instability."
"It's a bit technical, related to the instance of migrations. It's a tough thing to handle, in every new release, in every upgrade, that we have to do things in the applications or in the product. I think IBM is working on it but I know there are a lot of requests coming in from different organizations on this."
"User Interface components could be further refined to enhance and extend customizations dictated by end clients."
"The configuration is not that easy, and the initial deployment took three months."
"All our clients are changing to microservice and cloud service. However, BPM does not have a solution for microservice and cloud service."
"Process versioning was tricky, not straightforward."
"IBM BPM uses JavaScript as a programming language for the server-side. I don’t know why it’s not Java, as it’s more powerful and the JavaScript part is translated into Java anyway."
"I would like to see a lot more case studies."
"The pricing model is problematic."
"The setup is complex."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
IBM BPM is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Pega BPM, Appian and Apache Airflow, whereas Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Apache Airflow, Appian, Pega BPM, Camunda and ARIS Cloud. See our IBM BPM vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.