We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stale solution."
"We can scale by increasing the infrastructure which is currently running."
"We are implementing the tool to triple our monthly transaction volume."
"IBM BPM is equipped with all the functionalities which are needed for building BPM enterprise-level applications."
"With the tester coach wherein you can interact with the interface while you're designing the process."
"Initially, the process architecture studio was very helpful and it was compliant with BPMN standards."
"The possibility to add Java code as embedded .jar, that increases the flexibility of the solution."
"It makes the company business processes work more efficiently."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"It saves time as tasks are automated."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"From the testing perspective and minor enhancements perspective, customization is something that is a little tedious as compared to new tools. In addition, various open-source tools that are available are not working with IBM BPM."
"IBM BPM needs to have a better and modified interface."
"It can definitely be improved in terms of performance and stability."
"The setup was quite complex because the solution was cutting-edge at that time and IBM invested considerably in the implementation, likely at a loss to themselves."
"Process versioning was tricky, not straightforward."
"We would like better performance and more visibility on each step of the tool."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"I would like to see the front-end support improved because it should be fully integrated and supported."
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Oracle BPM, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Bizagi. See our IBM BPM vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
